Abortion Profiteers

         In November 1978, the clams Sun-Times publish the miscarriage Profiteers, an investigative c entirely that revea lead deplorable corruption and put-on in some(pre no.inal) shoot air mile Avenue spontaneous abortion clinics. fiver months ear duplicityfulnessr the Sun-Times had receive a tip from a plausible government origination (who wished to persevere anonymous) that it was possible four local abortion clinics were falsification maternity tests so that they could perform excess abortions upon unsuspecting women. The Sun-Times began its investigating in conjunction with the Better disposal Association (BGA). First, hush-hush investigators present as women in imply of pregnancy focusing and submitted priapic person urine samples to the referral agencies for testing. afterwards(prenominal) the referral agencies reported several of the antheral samples to be positively pregnant, they referred the reporters to kale Avenue clinics for abortions. The Sun-Times deepened its investigation by having its hush-hush reporters obtain jobs at several of the abortion clinics.          quaternity months of clandestine investigation provided the Sun-Times with all the evidence it withdrawed to thwart the Madison Avenue clinics, although professedly some of this evidence had been receive through the illegal save up of medical checkup files. During this time the investigators grow chilling tales non notwithstanding of false abortions, but late-pregnancy abortions, unauthorized medical personnel, Medic are fraud, improper anesthetic(a) administration, and many other recreational and unhonorable works. The publication of the Abortion Profiteers shocked the community and it lastly resulted in the closing of deuce Michigan Avenue clinics, the impounding of one of the doctors, and new regulative natural laws for outpatient abortion clinics. At the booby of this chilling tale are several issues that pose well-known(prenominal) ethical dilemmas for the media.         First, is undercover investigative insurance coverage an ethical mean of obtaining data? Some would suggest no. Opponents of undercover news media movement that it is unethical for reporters to falsely introduce themselves in rove to on purpose deceive people of their occupation. They would vie that instead of move undercover investigative reporters to the abortion clinic, the Sun-Times should get passed the law and false the investigation over to them. Advocates of investigative journalism support this practice by claiming that the ends justify the means. They determine that the reporters did not blatantly lie to the abortion clinics, they simply omitted some of the truth. some(prenominal) undercover journalism supporters agitate that the legal philosophy are prevalently hampered in their investigations by the practically mundane process of obtaining expect warrants and other proficient police procedures. They typically cipher the place from a useful locating in that they recall the bulk of the people forget do good from undercover journalism.         If, for the sake of argument, undercover investigative reporting was deemed to be ethical in this situation, and so it raises the foreland of whether the investigation was conducted ethically and professionally. The undercover reporters from the Sun-Times began its investigation in cooperation with the B.G.A. and I view that this was a good start. However, the reporters violated the law when they made unauthorized copies of to a greater extent than one hundred medical records. While I definetely believe that breaking the law was absolutely unprofessional, I figure that the investigators actions are still arguably ethical. The iniquity of illegal copying appears belittled in comparison with the weighty acts that the abortion clinics were committing. The reporters contradicted their actions by claiming the need for evidence.         Another ethical question that this story poses is whether or not a reporter has an tariff to prevent maltreat to those just about them.

The undercover journalists from the Sun-Times interacted with many women at the abortion clinics who were beingness misled and disposed false pregnancies. While they did not participate in the certain abortion procedures, they did extradite contact with the patients both onward and after the operation. During the course of their investigation the reporters witnessed frequent complications and even several deaths. Did the reporters engender an obligation to these women? Some would point that the journalists should fork up through with(p) much to prevent harm. The Sun-Times had learned indoors the first a partner off of(prenominal) weeks of its investigation that these false abortions were therefore being performed and it could have scratch the investigation over to the police at that point. This would have defend many of the innocent women who were needlessly harmed (and killed) during the following four months. However, others would consider that the need for evidence justifies the additional four months of investigative work. They invent the utilitarian perspective and bring up that the harm done to a few results in the security measures system of the many.         I as well view this situation from a primarily utilitarian perspective. Although I feel that the journalists should not have illegally copied medical records and maybe should have conducted a slimly shorter investigation, in the end I believe that the ends justify the means. The Chicago Sun-Times reporters succeeded in uncovering a wind vane of deceit and scandal that ultimately led to new laws to protect women in outpatient abortion clinics. Although I figure that the investigation could have been more professional, in the end it resulted in greater protection for the about people.                   If you want to get a full essay, monastic state it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper