'Leadership Approach Essay\r'

' discordant theoretical apostrophizees have been conducted to determine the impact of lead and the key attributes of effective leading. The five research approach comprise of the trait approach, behavior approach, power- stoop approach, spotal approach, and integrative approach. Although each(prenominal) approach has its merits and issues, the focus of this paper will be the situational approach.\r\nOverview\r\nThe situational leading approach views leadership in similitude to a specific context. The ponder suggests that for every situation a specific leadership dah is divert. In situational leadership, the calculates that affect the leadership style include the situation, the organization, the retainers, the quantify and the nature of work (Yukl, 2010). By assessing these factors, leaders stir decisions on their leadership style. In addition, situational leadership has two subcategories. The first one reviews the similarity or differences of leadership within an org anization. This work involves using comparison amidst situations and the differences or similarities amongst approaches.\r\nThe second study evaluates the correlational statistics between leadership traits, skills and attributes to leadership effectiveness (Yukl, 2010). Finally, the study by Paul Hersey and Kenneth Blanchard in 1969 provided a hyaloplasm of conversation for subprogram in this type of leadership. The matrix recommends the use of four influence competencies such as vocalizing or ordering, selling, delegating and participating. distributively style is adapted to the follower’s maturity or competency. â€Å"The four styles suggest that leaders should put great or less focus on the toil in question and/or the relationship between the leader and the follower, depending on the development level of the follower” (Changing Minds, 2012).\r\nStrengths and Weaknesses\r\nThe strength of the situational approach of research is that it provides a variet y of study iterations, thus allowing for the researchers to control authorized split of the study. Moreover, the situation is observable and results are easy to understand. so the study provides flexibility and control in modifying conf utilize factors within the control situation. For instance, by manipulating a certain control situation, researchers can review the leaders’ reactions and methods to declaration the issues put forward. The weaknesses of using this approach are that it contains in like manner many variables. Endless numbers of variables can be factored in to a situation and thus, can compel confusion in the study. Moreover, the approach does not clearly distinguish between leadership and management and condition a situation, managers can act as leaders and vice versa without further clarification.\r\nExamples of Situational Leadership\r\nSituational leadership exists in __________, a financial service firm, and the author’s current employer. Situ ational leaders use four influence competencies such as telling or directing, selling, delegating, and participating. Each style must be applied to the appropriate situation being affected and the audience or group being addressed (Changing Minds, 2012). The examples will be based on the author’s observations of her direct superior, the Senior Partner of the company, (â€Å"Eric”). As senior partner, Eric is in charge of the company’s strategic direction. Thus, he delegates authority to various skilled and competent individuals. In everyday business, Eric uses the delegating and participating style.\r\nHe understands that the distinguish managers and senior stave are skilled to like every day issues. However, in times of suspicion and stress, for instance, the possible breed market decline, Eric shifts his style to more than of a telling or directing style. This telling or directing style is typically used in lower competency and low impudence group of fol lowers. Even though Eric realizes that the senior staff members are well trained to handle stock market declines, Eric looks at the situation and modifies his behavior and communication style to a more directive leadership.\r\n proof\r\nThe situational approach in studying leadership provides an overview of the use different traits, skills and communication styles in order to hold out into the situation. Although this approach has its merits and weaknesses, it is the most widely used leadership study. Regardless of the approach used in study or leadership style, the most important factor is the leader’s accountability for the outcome of the decisions made.\r\n reference\r\nChanging Minds, (2012), Hersey and Blanchard’s Approach, Retrieved from: http://changingminds.org/disciplines/leadership/styles/situational_leadership_hersey_blan chard.htm\r\nYukl, G. A. (2006). Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:\r\nPearson/Prentice Hall.\r\n'