Food Inc. Case Study Essay

1. How has technology been applied to the food merchandise process? Give/describe at least 3 examples. In the sound 50 years, technology has completely compoundd the way we eat. When we think nearly farming, we think red barns, green grass, free-roaming animals, and so on conjure uping, now-a-days, is far opposite than the physical body the industry has lead us to believe. Farming has become a extremely industrialized and mechanized telephone circuit. The reality is our food is no longer attack from farms its coming off assembly lines in factories, just desire automobiles. Due to the high demand for certain casings of foods, technology has all(a)owed us to change the way we germinate our food. Through genetic engineering, scientists grow been able to hold in genetically modified organisms (GMOs) into the food system to help with the shortage of food. feature for in spot, the chicken. In 1950, it took farmers 70 days to raise a chicken. Now, it takes half the time, f urther 48 days. Not only throw out farmers grow chickens faster, they can grow them to be bigger.To meet the needs of consumers preferences for white meat, scientists do specific changes to the chickens desoxyribonucleic acid that made it possible to re formulate the chicken to have larger breasts (Wikipedia.org). some other bea where technology was applied to our food crossingion process was through and through crops. In the 1930s scientists riseed a hybrid seed for corn whiskey, this hybrid had stronger stalks that resisted universe blown over and it allowed farmers to plant the crop closer unitedly (Food, Inc. Discussion Guide). Resulting in higher yields, 100 years ago a farmer in America could grow maybe 20 bushels of corn on an acre. Today, 200 bushels is no problem (Food, Inc.). With the surplus of corn, scientists were able to develop more holds for it. A couple of examples include corn-based ethanol fuel, high-fructose corn syrup, maltodextrin, etc. Even though th e technological advances mentioned above are astounding, one cant help but wonder how these changes are affecting society.2. How has business influenced government in the sylvan / food industry? Give at least 3 examples from the infotainment. Monsanto has influenced government in many ways when it comes to the agricultural / food industry. Michael Pallon, an American author / journalist / activist, states There has been this revolving door surrounded by Monsantos corporate offices and the various regulatory and judicial bodies that have made thekey decisions. (Food, Inc.). For example, Justice Clarence Thomas (1991 Present) was an attorney for Monsanto from 1976 1979 and wrote the majority of the opinion that refused farmers from alter and saving their own seed (Food, Inc.) Monsanto as well had very close ties to the bush-league and Clinton Administration.These ties eliminated the political debates over the extreme change in our food system. For the last 25 years, our govern ment has been dominated by the industries that it was meant to be regulating (Food, Inc.). pull in for example, Michael Taylor King, a Spaulding lawyer from 1994 1991. He advised his client, Monsanto, on GMF approximateing. Then in 1991, he became the Deputy Commissioner for Policy and oversaw the FDAs decision not to label GMFs. As stated in the film, there is too much centralised power. Farmers are going into more and more debt with each year fugacious and whats truly sad about the whole situation is they have no control over the businesses they worked tooth and nail for.3. What is the FDAs most authentic policy on genetically engineered foods? If you use a quote, then use two paragraphs or more to support the quote.According to Noelle Cremers with the California Farm Bureau the FDAs most current policy regarding genetically engineered foods is as follows, And if I can point out the reason that we are concerned with labeling is it creates unnecessary fear in a consumers mind . Until the industry has an hazard to educate why we want to use this technology and the value of the technology, we simulatet feel that consumers just having a warning label provide help them (Food, Inc.). The problem with this is it violates consumers rights. As stated in the consumers Magna Carta that was spelled out by President John F. Kennedy, consumers have four radical rights, the right to be informed, the right to safety, the right to choose, and the right to be hear (Carroll and Buchholtz 392).The FDA is violating at least three of consumers rights by not labeling for GMOs. commencement with the right to be informed, which refers to the consumers right to know about a product, its use, and the cautions to be exercised while using it (Carroll and Buchholtz 392). Without labeling, consumers have no clue what they are consuming, they are not informed. Next, the FDA is violating consumers right to safety which refers to concerns ofa product be dangerous (Carroll and Buch holtz 392). Even though GMOs were discovered in the 1970s, approximately 40 years ago, there is little to no question proving these products are safe for us to consume. Are they trying to cover up the fact that they are dangerous? Lastly, they are not allowing consumers the right to choose. Without honest disclosure of GMOs, how can one make an accurate choice? As far as the right to be heard, the FDA is hearing consumers desires and grievances towards the labeling of GMOs, theyre just not listening.4. What evidence do you see in the documentary that business is taking a more proactive, socially responsible stance to food production? To point it is possible for businesses to have a proactive, socially responsible stance in the way food is produced, the documentary focus on two companies, Polyface Farms and Stonyfield Farms. Joel Salatin, owner of Polyface Farms, is hitting the nail on the oral sex when it comes to being a socially responsible business owner. Hes upholding his e conomic responsibility to be profitable. He may not be striving to have his food sold at Wal-Mart, but he is charging customers f vent prices for the quality of food he is providing. Polyface Farms is being legally responsible by obeying all laws.Although, the United States Department of countrified did try shutting them down because their operations are open to the air and it is considered to be unsanitary. However, he had his workplace cultured at a local anaesthetic microbiology lab and the results averaged 133 colony forming units, where the cultures from stores averaged 3600 colony forming units. In microbiology, colony-forming unit (CFU) is an estimate of workable bacterial or fungal numbers. Unlike direct microscopic counts where all cells, dead and living, are counted, CFU estimates viable cells (Wikipedia.org). Lastly, Polyface farms is withholding there ethical standards high. well-nigh could argue that killing animals for food is wrong, but that is a completely differe nt subject.The company is showing respect to the planet, their workers, the animals, and their consumers. In the documentary Joel Salatin states, I mean, a culture that just facets a pig as a grass of protoplasmic inanimate structure to be manipulated by whatever creative design that humans can foist on that critter will probably view individuals within its community and other cultures in the community ofnations with the same type of disdain, disrespect and controlling-type mentality. (Food, Inc.).That statement alone proves he is ethically responsible. The documentary also focused on Stonyfield Farms as a socially responsible company. Gary Hirschberg, the coo of Stonyfield Farms states, When we started out, we were a seven-cow farm. We wanted to prove that business could be part of the dissolvent to the globes environmental problems. At the same time we had to prove that we could be highly profitable (Food, Inc.). Stonyfield is the third largest yogurt brand in America, and they are the most profitable, e.g. theyre being economically responsible. The company is proving to be ethically responsible by providing organic yogurt, quality products, to the consumers at a responsible price, and you can tell in the documentary that their animals are being treated with respect.The cows were roaming free and were very clean, the farm had red barns that were kept nicely, and the grass was green. More and more companies today, are sprinting into the organic business. They are starting time to realize that consumers are waking up and seeing behind the obnubilate the food industry has put up. Consumers want to be healthy, be reckon as both consumers and worker, and they want to preserve our environment for future generations. kit and caboodle CitiedCarroll, Archie B., and Buchholtz, Ann K. Business and Society Ethics, Sustainability,and Stakeholder Management. 8th ed. Mason, OH Cengage, 2012. Colony-forming Unit. Wikipedia.org. 4 February 2014. 18 touch 2014 http//e n.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colony-forming_unitFood, Inc. Dir. Robert Kenner. Perf. Robert Kenner Richard Pearce Eric Schlosser genus Melissa Robledo William Pohlad Jeff Skoll Robin Schorr Diane Weyermann Elise Pearlstein Kim Roberts Michael Pollan Gary Hirshberg Joel Salatin Mark Adler.Los Angeles, CA Magnolia Home Entertainment, 2009. DVD.Food, Inc. Discussion Guide. Takepart.com. 15 March 2014Genetically Modified Food. Wikipedia.org. 17 March 2014. 18 March 2014 http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_food