Comparing Webers and Durkheims Methodological Contributions to Sociol

analyse webers and Durkheims Methodological Contributions to Sociology This essay will be examining the methodological contributions both Durkheim and Weber attain provided to sociology. It will briefly observe what Positivists are and how their methodologies influence and require their research. It will also consider what interpretative sociology is, and why their pillowcase of methodological analysis is used when carrying out research. It will analyse both Durkheims study of felo-de-se and also Webers study of The Protestant work ethic, and hopefully establish how to each 1 methodology was used for each crabby piece of research, and why. Emile Durkhiem, in sociology linguistic process is considered to be a Functionalist, in addition to also world a Positivist, however, strictly speaking, Durkheim was not a Positivist. This is because he did not follow the plus rule that states that sociological study should be confined to observable or dire ctly measurable phenomena. Functionalists believe that in order for society to lock correctly, there need to be shared values to help offer social order. Society is viewed as a stable, orderly musical arrangement. This stable system is in equilibrium and reflects societal consensus where the majority of members share a vulgar set of values, beliefs, and social expectations. Functionalists also believe that society consists of interrelated part each part serves a function and contributes to the stability of the society. Positivists believe that as a science, sociology can be objective and value-free. Disinterested scientific observers shouldnt and dont inescapably introduce bias into the research process. ... ...our different types of suicide, and that most suicides can arrive into one of those categories. Although sociologists like J.D. Douglas would question the reliability of the statistics, due to the coroners decision being final, most socio logists would agree that Durkheims study into suicide was successful, and indeed many have tried to develop and improve on his theory. Overall, this essay has signaln that one type of methodology may not always be suitable for the particular research carried out. Both Interpretative sociology and the Positivist approach equally show that they are valid methods for carrying out research, but like everything, nothing is one hundred percent accurate. Therefore, there is always room for flaw, but in the study of Sociology, there is always room for more ways of obtaining and rendering data.