Is Morality Subjective or Objective? Essay -- Philosophy Philosophical

Is incorruptity Subjective or Objective? Morality must be objectively derived because (1) the concepts of good and lessonity exist (2) cultures differ regarding certain clean actions, thus there is the need to discover which is right but cultures ar similar regarding the being of and need for morality (3) relativism is non logical and does not work, (4) for moral principles to be legitimate and consistent, they must be derived external to kind societies. Otherwise morality is merely one persons choice or noticeing, not an understanding of truth and (5) the existence of religion. People recognize a moral aspect to the worship of deity even if the deity does not exist, we as yet perceive a need for morality to be decreed by Someone or something greater than humans. 1. First, the concepts of good and morality exist. The very existence of the idea of good argues for something in human society that is different than the bunnies and the wolves. nature is amoral the bunnies do no t protest the fact that wolves eat them. There is no notion, outside of Bambi, that the animals consider some of themselves good and some bad. Thus, the nature of humanity is somehow different than other creatures. Somehow we know that certain principles and actions ar good and acceptable, rather than simply necessary for existence. We contemplate the abstract perspective of moral principle itself, and the universality of such an idea. All human cultures do not have exactly the same moral codes, but entirely cultures have a moral code. This concept of the nature of humanity argues for a code of morality that fits all people we seek it, we believe it, we feel that we need it. Second, cultures differ regarding certain moral actions but all cultures... ...s, 1998. Paton, H.J. The Moral Law Kants Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. London Hutchinson University Library, 1961. Philosophical Psychology. Abstract of article in Volume 11, Number 4, December, 1998. www.cs.indiana.edu /hyplan/cdelance Plato. The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Bollingen Series LXXI. Edited by Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns. Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press, 1961. Satris, Stephen. Taking Sides Clashing Views on Controversial Moral Issues. Guilford, CT Dushkin/McGraw-Hill, 2000. Schick, Theodore, jr. Morality Requires God... or Does It? The Council for Secular Humanism. 17 July 2002. Article from Free interrogative Magazine, vol.17, number 3. www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/schick_17_3.html Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The Cambridge Platonists. 17 July 2002. http//plato.stanford.edu