Percieved control and academic achievment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Percieved control and academic achievment - search ExampleThey totalled to about 19 respon dents. The findings also show that majority of the respondents have poor mental ability. exploitation the cheer 0.05 level of significance, F-statistics, and an Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, the df num value is k-1, or 2 -1, or 1 and the df den value is T-k, or 50 - 2, or 48. So, with = 0.05, the critical value of F in this analysis of variance test was F0.05 (1, 48) = 251. Since computed F (FC) is less than Tabulated F (FT), Ho is accepted, which states that the Rotters LOCUS of Control tally and the Average grade point average of the selected respondents has no significant relationship.In other words, the result of the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) shows that the computed F, 0.103 is less than the tabular determine of F-statistics, 251 at 0.05 degrees of freedom, 1, 48. This denotes that the grade point average has no significant effect on the Rotters LOCUS of Control survey results. The outcome R square value is 0.002. This is very far from the point of reference value 1. This shows that the correlation is not on the normal curve distribution. So, it is interpreted as very small positive correlation. In centile (%), it is 0.2 which indicates that the Rotters LOCUS of Control scores and the Average GPA of the selected respondents has very minimal similarities.Furthermore, because the R square value of 0.002 is not close to the adjusted R square value of -0.019, this signifies that the regression model is not follow for the data. The very small positive correlation denotes that the Rotters LOCUS of Control scores is uncorrelated with the Average GPA of the selected respondents, it may be either boastful or small when the scores or frequency is large and vice versa. This further implies that there is no systematic trend in the Rotters LOCUS of Control scores and the Average GPA of the selected respondents.AppendicesScoreFrequencyPercent sensible PercentCumulat ive Percent reasoned612.02.02.0736.06.08.0848.08.016.0936.06.022.010918.018.040.011714.014.054.012510.010.064.013612.012.076.01436.06.082.01624.04.086.01712.02.088.018510.010.098.01912.02.0100.0Total50100.0100.0Note newspaper column 2 and 3 were used for figure 1Average GPAFrequencyPercentValid PercentCumulative PercentValid124.04.04.02714.014.018.031020.020.038.041326.026.064.05612.012.076.06612.012.088.0736.06.094.0836.06.0100.0Total50100.0100.0Note Column 2 and 3 were used for figure 2 dozens versus Average GPARegressionVariables